Your Legal Team provided legal advice reviewing an issue concerning the settlement of rent for a large shopping mall.
Company A was experiencing difficulties because, due to the lessor's mistake, it was being retroactively charged for unpaid rent accumulated over several years.
In particular, in a situation where the special-clause provisions of the contract conflicted with the principal contractual terms, a review was needed of the legitimacy of the amount claimed by the lessor and the possibility of imposing default interest.
The firm closely reviewed the applicability of the principle of estoppel and presented a legal interpretation based on the principle that the special-clause provisions of the contract take precedence.
Through this, the client secured the grounds for negotiating a reduction of the rent settlement amount and was able to minimize the burden of default interest.